Recently I ran across a survey about worship practices in
Congregational churches, published in 1889.
The study was the work of a committee appointed by the National Council
of Congregational Churches to inquire about changes taking place, and (they
probably hoped) to rectify some problems.
The committee received back some 1500 questionnaires, about
one-third of those sent out. Most of
these were from larger and more urban churches with more formal public worship
than smaller rural ones; even so, the results suggest that Congregationalists
were still demonstrably fixed in their tradition and wary of “rote
formulas”—many of which, of course, (the Gloria Patri, Lord’s Prayer, and
Doxology) have become fixed elements of so-called traditional worship today.
The basic form of the service was pretty much unchanged from
the 17th century: an invocation, a hymn, reading of Scripture,
prayer, “notices,” another hymn, the sermon, a prayer, and then the
benediction. “But upon this parent stem there have been grafted many
additions,” the committee reported. Actually fairly few late-nineteenth century
Congregational churches (538, or about one-third of those returning a survey)
repeated the Lord’s Prayer together, and even fewer (360) sang the Gloria
Patri. A majority, but not all (941) took up a collection during the service. “Whie
the offerings are being gathered, it will be helpful for the minister to recite
appropriate passages of Scripture; and as the collectors come simultaneously
before the pulpit, and stand there with the offerings still in their hands, a
brief prayer for God’s willing givers, and on the work their gift is to
forward, will deepen the religious impression.”) More of them sang the Doxology
(913), but far fewer (49) read the Apostles Creed at the morning service or
used written prayers (59).
Certainly non-Congregational formalisms like chanting, the
use of quartets and paid choirs, and unison prayers were becoming increasingly
popular in wealthier churches. But the committee report urged a middle
way: “A few of our ministers, chiefly in
New England, are using occasionally written forms of prayer, and, as they may
think, with excellent results. They think they find in them a chaste dignity, a
touching tenderness, and a power to quicken the devotional spirit, not easily
secured when all the prayers are extemporaneous. The large majority of our
churches and pastors, on the other hand, appear to feel that the freshness and
fervor of spontaneous prayer are more conducive to spirituality. It is
possible, however,” the report concluded, “that the future may see a
combination of the two methods in many churches.”
It’s easy to imagine Congregational forebears recoiling in
absolute horror at quartets and chants and creeds and rote prayers. They fought
a lot of hard battles with the Church of England to free themselves from those
very practices. But I don’t think they’d be opposed in principle to changes in
the worship service. After all, the basic idea behind the Congregational Way
was freedom from external forms, especially when they threatened to overwhelm
the subtle, quiet work of the Spirit in the lives of ordinary people and in the
life of the community.
-Peggy
Recent Comments